NUMBER OF SYSTEMS DESIGNED BY A SUBSCRIBER

Sunday morning, and I was just about to add another system (I have 60 already), but wasn't "allowed" to.
Checking other established subscribers' systems, I find one has 99....another has 100.
I would think that you would encourage more systems?
My new system throws up 60%+ winners, but most of them are short–priced..............but I'm happy with that.

Hoping you will judge in my favour.
ST.JAYDEE

Max allowed now just twenty. Seems a very low number.

I Have 26 Systems Dedicated To Melbourne Cup / Oaks Day + Caulfield Cup Alone.
So I Have Asked For An Extension Of the Twenty, As I Can Not Save Any More Created Systems.

All good now......have had my limit lifted.......don't think I'll ever get up to 100 systems, ....but who knows?

Hi guys,

The idea with the limit is not to restrict the activities of experienced users. We just don't want a heap of redundant systems slowing down the nightly stats calculation and this seemed the best/easiest way to do it.

If you haven't had your limit increased and you want it, drop an e–mail to support.

Also, it makes sense to delete systems like your seasonal feature race stuff and then reactivate them at the appropriate time.

Is 20 systems to maximum number of you can have at any one time?

This limitation does not apply to me, yet.
I can see users and Pf admin points though...

Personally I think its in your own interests to 'clean house' every so often, especially with poorly performing (non–profitable) systems.
I dont like clutter so I get rid of waste, it slows me down.

Good punting Ladies and Gents!

I agree in most part if a system is year's old and showing a loss then yes get rid of it or at least archive it.

However, most of my systems are only 1 – 6 months old and still unproven.

Although I have already reached my 20 system limit, I still want to be able to create better systems hopefully and have them displayed so that I can monitor their performance and compare them against my other systems.

I'm happy to do a "Spring Clean" once a year and clear out the clutter, but not after 6 months... It's too early to disregard a profitable system, just because you have reached your limit of 20 and you have 19 better ranking systems. We all know system performance can change for better or for worse in just a few months.

All true.

You can get some wild swings Up n Down with only 10 or 20 runners.
Once you have e.g 100x Runners you do get a very good idea about where the system is heading, $ Profit or Loss.
Obviously e.g 1000x is better than 100x due to having bigger data–set (bigger IS better).

You dont need e.g 7000 runners and 2000 Winners at 13% p.o.t to prove a system or not.
Once you get e.g 100 W/300 Q and 10%+ $ P.o.t, u r good 2 Go!!

Simon Miller & MoodysMonster Goes Alright Always Getting Winners.

??????

Don't get me started.

I can't decide if they're poor "back" systems, or very ordinary "lay" systems.

(more question marks)

[Top]

This reply will be quoting another reply! [UnQuote]

Reply

Forum Activity

Apprentice filter broken

pie2251 3/22/2019 9:17:23 AM
6

LAY SYSTEMS

Wellbrock13 3/16/2019 3:48:29 PM
27

Bragging Your Systems

ST.JAYDEE 3/16/2019 11:05:33 AM
14

LAY SYSTEMS

Wellbrock13 3/16/2019 7:18:41 AM
27

LAY SYSTEMS

Effer V 3/14/2019 5:39:10 PM
27
Create New Topic

Latest Forum Posts

Apprentice filter broken

Any Updates On This, It's Killing My Punting.
Written by: pie2251
3/22/2019 9:17:23 AM 6 Replies

LAY SYSTEMS

Correction – can't get matched.
Written by: Wellbrock13
3/16/2019 3:48:29 PM 27 Replies

Bragging Your Systems

Thought I'd drop a line or 3 to add to the hype around the LAY systems being created.

RE: "SIMON MILLER" system.

On face value, when I check out the system's last 100 hits, it appears the system is a BACK system. Surely, it should be a LAY system?
Maybe the owner is just laying all their hits?

My question to PF...……. Is there a chance you would consider separating the 2 types? For example, with one click of the mouse, we would be directed to all the LAY systems, instead of spending time, sifting through all systems to find one we like.

Up until recently, I had nothing to do with LAY systems, but I decided to have a crack at one. I ended up with:
"LAY LADY LAY"
It's early days, so I'll keep my eyes on it and see how it goes.

Any comments/thoughts (good or bad) are welcome.

Cheers to all,
JD
Written by: ST.JAYDEE
3/16/2019 11:05:33 AM 14 Replies

"Bets Sheets" and "Today's Bet Sheet" missing qualifiers?

From another thread:
Harlem paid $31 SP (see Racing Australia website for official SP).
Looking at the System results on the day after the race (Sunday) would have been too early for Tote prices to have been available in our results database; that is why the Best of SP, NSW and Vic would have been shown as $31.00. System results update for any new data (new to our database) for a period up to 2 days later. If you check that system for that runner, you will find it now accounts for the Tote Prices as well.

As for any other issues mentioned, there is a high probability that similar explanations apply. A lot of information comes into our database at different times, which must then be transferred to other areas, cached etc etc.
Written by: puntingform
3/13/2019 2:32:30 PM 3 Replies

Odds errors on favourites

Hi James,
Harlem paid $31 SP (see Racing Australia website for official SP).
Looking at the System results on the day after the race (Sunday) would have been too early for Tote prices to have been available in our results database; that is why the Best of SP, NSW and Vic would have been shown as $31.00. System results update for any new data (new to our database) for a period up to 2 days later. If you check that system for that runner, you will find it now accounts for the Tote Prices as well.
Written by: puntingform
3/13/2019 2:25:04 PM 14 Replies

Today's Racing